Add to Chrome
✅ The verified answer to this question is available below. Our community-reviewed solutions help you understand the material better.
Which statement is INCORRECT?
The obligations thatarise from contract, delict, and unjustified enrichment, are always imposed bylaw, irrespective of the will of the parties.
The obligations that
arise from contract, delict, and unjustified enrichment, are always imposed by
law, irrespective of the will of the parties.
The law of contract,delict, and unjustified enrichment, all relate to the law of obligations.
The law of contract,
delict, and unjustified enrichment, all relate to the law of obligations.
Breach of contractand a delict are very similar, in that they both constitute civil wrongs and,in appropriate circumstances, give rise to a duty to pay damages.
Breach of contract
and a delict are very similar, in that they both constitute civil wrongs and,
in appropriate circumstances, give rise to a duty to pay damages.
Sometimes, concurrentcontractual and delictual liability can arise, so that the plaintiff may sue oneither basis.
Sometimes, concurrent
contractual and delictual liability can arise, so that the plaintiff may sue on
either basis.
In the absence of avalid contract, an unjustified enrichment claim may arise when there is atransfer of wealth from one person’s estate to another person’s estate, withouta good legal ground or cause for this shift.
In the absence of a
valid contract, an unjustified enrichment claim may arise when there is a
transfer of wealth from one person’s estate to another person’s estate, without
a good legal ground or cause for this shift.
Get Unlimited Answers To Exam Questions - Install Crowdly Extension Now!