First-yes-counts instruction is beneficial to suspects and should be included in all future lineups

First-yes-counts instruction only has a statistical impact on the number of suspect IDs due to the termination of the lineup

First-yes-counts instruction produces conservative criterion shifts (ie reduces the number of identifications) in eyewitnesses and can therefore be misleading

First-yes-counts instruction does not affect the number or type of identifications by eyewitnesses in lineups

She needed to use exclusion criteria to be eligible for open science pre-registration

She needed to reduce the noise in her data so she could better detect patterns

She needed to reduce participant eligibility to meet a journal's deadline

She needed to decrease her sample size

ROC curves show which lineup procedure is better, regardless of the eyewitness’ willingness to choose

ROC curves show the impact of willingness to choose on identification performance

ROC curves only work in the lab, not in the field

ROC curves show that simultaneous and sequential lineups equally affect eyewitness ID error

Getting in touch with a journal early to earn brownie points ahead of a submission

Reporting one's study plans before conducting the study to maintain accountability about one's research practices

Signing up to participate in a study before the study begins

Applying to become a filler in a lineup

To choose the suspect out of a lineup

To verify police testimony

To evaluate the quality of a lineup

To provide evidence that the suspect is guilty or innocent

To prove that showups are better to use than lineups

To boost the confidence of the eyewitness before testifying in court

To provide fairness to the suspect

To document the testimony of the witness