logo

Crowdly

English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski)

Looking for English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski) test answers and solutions? Browse our comprehensive collection of verified answers for English phonetics and phonology (2024–2025) (1BA/02) (Michalski) at lms.amu.edu.pl.

Get instant access to accurate answers and detailed explanations for your course questions. Our community-driven platform helps students succeed!

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈwɒnæ || ˈwɑːnæ/

0%
100%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈdʌŋhɪl/

0%
100%
0%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈtelp/

100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈflɪ/

0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈtɪnn/

0%
0%
100%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈʧiːtəh/

0%
100%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈkʌmpəniː/

100%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈkriːm/

100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈfɪlm/

100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Say if the example provided below meets the phonotactic criteria for being a word of English, either native or borrowed from another language.

If a given example could exist only if part of it were a suffix, e.g. —s, ’s, or —ed, the answer is “Yes.”

If two transcriptions are provided next to each other, separated with a double pipe (||), the one on the left is supposed to be GenBrit, the one on the right—GenAm. They are either both ‘good’ or they are both ‘bad,’ for the same reason.

/ˈtrɪmk/

100%
0%
0%
0%
View this question

Want instant access to all verified answers on lms.amu.edu.pl?

Get Unlimited Answers To Exam Questions - Install Crowdly Extension Now!